Coleman earlier said that two of the three bids were from operators who didn’t have the experience in operating a mix of market and social housing units while the third bid was for a co-op, which is not part of the ministry’s mandate.
The operators are to provide $46 million up front to the city, which is the mortgage, guaranteed by the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation and BC Housing, and based on the variety of rents that will be paid.
The below-market tenants, who are expected to be from the 10,000 people on BC Housing’s waiting list for social housing, will be mostly low-income families, not hard-to-house people with addiction and mental illness issues found in many social housing projects in the Downtown Eastside.
Vancouver city councillor Andrea Reimer said the city still doesn’t understand why the bids were rejected.
“The Portland Hotel Society is one of the bidders and they run a lot of housing in the city. It’s hard to see anything that would be concerning about them at the Olympic Village given their track record, which is very good.”
Reimer said the Olympic Village social housing project is “absolutely a simple deal, compared to the complexities we have on the other 14 sites we are trying to build on.
“There must be a piece of information that we don’t have that would that would have made this decision make sense.”
NDP housing critic Shane Simpson was also critical of the province’s stance, saying, “these bids are no different than we’ve seen — it’s a standard operating agreement they are talking about.”
Robertson, meanwhile, said he was surprised that only three of the 22 potential bidders who viewed the site in August decided to bid.
“It’s confounding that it’s been slow and hasn’t drawn more operator interest to a brand-new building that should have lower operating costs because of energy efficiencies.”
dward@vancouversun.com
